Paul J Singh

There are certain stocks I watch closely at the beginning of every earnings season, not necessarily because I want to trade them immediately, but because they tell me something about what is happening underneath the surface of the market. JPMorgan is one of those stocks. As we head into a new earnings season, $JPM is sitting near all-time highs after a powerful run over the past few months, and more importantly, it has done this while maintaining a strong technical structure, absorbing profit-taking, holding its major moving averages, and repeatedly finding buyers on pullbacks.

I tweeted this heading into earnings week:

Basing at all time high as we head into EARNINGS WEEK

Sometimes rules are made to be broken. Later we’ll talk about our bank trade $JPM, how we saw the rotation signs early and riding the pullbacks even when stop levels were hit.

There are really two stories here. The first is the obvious one: JPMorgan is basing near all-time highs heading into earnings, which is exactly where you want to see a market leader before a major catalyst. The second story is much more important for traders because this trade became an example of why mechanical rules sometimes have to be overridden by market context. Stops matter, risk management matters, and having a repeatable process matters, but understanding sector rotation, relative strength, institutional accumulation, and the character of a stock can sometimes be more important than blindly following a single level on a chart.

JPMorgan Is Telling Us Something About the Market

One of the biggest mistakes traders make is looking at every stock as an individual situation. They see a breakout and trade the breakout, see a pullback and trade the pullback, or see a stop level get hit and automatically exit the position. There is nothing inherently wrong with any of that, and in fact, those rules are necessary for developing traders because without structure, trading quickly turns into improvisation and hope. The problem comes when we forget that stocks do not move in isolation and that the larger market context can sometimes tell us more than an individual price level.

Money flows through the market. It moves from sector to sector, industry to industry, and eventually into individual stocks, which is why one of the biggest parts of my trading process is trying to identify where money is moving before everyone else starts talking about it. That was the real story behind JPMorgan. While much of the market’s attention continued to focus on technology, AI, semiconductors, and the usual momentum names, financials were quietly strengthening. Bank stocks were improving technically, the sector was attracting money, and JPMorgan was establishing itself as one of the leaders within that rotation.

When I find a strong stock inside a strengthening sector, I am much more willing to ride through normal volatility than I would be with an isolated breakout in a weak industry. That does not mean ignoring risk or refusing to take a loss. It means recognizing that the quality of the underlying setup can influence how aggressively or patiently we manage the trade.

The Early Rotation Signs

The JPMorgan trade started with something I talk about constantly: sector before ticker. Before I become interested in an individual stock, I want to know what is happening around it. Are other stocks in the industry acting well? Is the sector strengthening? Are multiple stocks breaking out together? Are pullbacks being bought? Are stocks holding their moving averages? Is volume confirming the move?

When several stocks from the same group begin acting well at the same time, that tells us something important because institutions rarely build positions in just one stock. Money tends to move into themes, sectors, and industries, and once that process starts, it can persist much longer than most traders expect. JPMorgan was showing us those signs. After the sharp market correction earlier this year, the stock recovered quickly, reclaimed its 50-day moving average, held its longer-term uptrend, and eventually pushed back toward its previous highs.

The most important part of the move, however, was not the initial breakout. It was what happened afterward. Every time JPMorgan pulled back, buyers stepped in. The stock repeatedly tested short-term support without suffering meaningful technical damage, and even when individual stop levels were violated, the broader structure remained intact. That created an interesting dilemma for trade management: do we follow the rule and abandon the trade, or do we recognize that the thesis behind the trade remains valid and continue working the position?

Sometimes Rules Are Made to Be Broken

I want to be careful with this idea because it can easily be misunderstood. Breaking your trading rules is usually a terrible idea, and traders lose enormous amounts of money rationalizing bad trades. A stop gets hit, they move it lower. The stock drops again, they create a new thesis. Eventually, what began as a swing trade becomes an investment because they refuse to admit they were wrong.

That is not what happened with JPMorgan. There is a major difference between breaking a rule because you do not want to take a loss and adjusting trade management because the evidence supporting the original thesis remains intact. Our thesis was not simply that JPMorgan would break above a certain price. The thesis was that money was rotating into financials, JPMorgan was one of the strongest stocks within that rotation, the longer-term trend remained healthy, and weakness continued to attract buyers.

As long as those conditions remained intact, the trade deserved more flexibility. This is one of the areas where experienced traders begin moving beyond rigid technical analysis because a stop level is not magical and the market does not know where your stop is. The real question is whether the price action that triggered the stop invalidated the thesis behind the trade. Sometimes the answer is yes, and the trade needs to be closed. Sometimes the answer is no, and the broader evidence tells us the opportunity is still there.

With JPMorgan, the stock repeatedly showed us that the larger trend remained intact, which allowed us to continue working the trade rather than abandoning the idea every time short-term volatility shook the position.

The Pullbacks Were the Trade

Look at the chart and zoom out. JPMorgan has been trending higher for nearly two years, moving from under $200 to more than $330. During that period, the stock has experienced corrections, moving-average violations, failed breakouts, and sharp pullbacks, yet the dominant trend has remained higher. More recently, the stock corrected from its January highs toward $280 before beginning another powerful advance, reclaiming the 50-day moving average, consolidating, and eventually accelerating toward new highs.

This is where trade management becomes important. Once a stock has already made a significant move, chasing strength becomes increasingly difficult because the risk-reward deteriorates and your logical stop becomes farther away from your entry. The better opportunities often come during the pullbacks, especially when the stock is part of a strong sector and the larger trend remains intact.

That is what we tried to do with JPMorgan. Instead of abandoning the trade every time the stock experienced volatility, we continued evaluating the larger structure. The 50-day moving average was rising, the stock remained well above the 200-day moving average, financials continued to act well, buyers continued to appear on weakness, and JPMorgan continued to make progress within the larger uptrend. That was the evidence that allowed us to continue working the trade.

Now JPMorgan Is Basing at All-Time Highs

That brings us to the current setup. JPMorgan is trading around $336 and sitting just below its recent all-time high, and technically, this is exactly where I want to see a strong stock heading into a major catalyst. The stock has already made a powerful move, but instead of immediately selling off and giving back those gains, it is consolidating near the highs and allowing its short-term moving averages to catch up.

This type of action matters because stocks that cannot hold their gains usually retreat quickly after extended moves. Sellers overwhelm buyers, profit-taking accelerates, and the stock begins retracing the previous advance. JPMorgan is doing something different. It is absorbing supply while continuing to trade near the highs, which means short-term traders can take profits without causing meaningful technical damage.

This is why bases near all-time highs can be so powerful. The stock is working off the previous advance through time rather than price. Instead of suffering a deep correction that needs to be repaired, JPMorgan is consolidating while maintaining its position near the top of the range. That does not guarantee another breakout, especially with earnings approaching, but it tells us that buyers remain willing to support the stock at elevated prices.

The Chart Is Strong, but Earnings Changes Everything

The technical structure heading into earnings is strong. The 9 EMA is around $333, the 50-day moving average is near $314, and the 200-day moving average is around $306. All three are rising, and the stock is trading above them, which is exactly what we want to see from a market leader.

Momentum has also cooled slightly while price remains near the highs, which could be constructive. Instead of becoming completely parabolic heading into earnings, the stock has begun consolidating and allowing some of the short-term extension to work itself off. From a purely technical perspective, there is a lot to like about the setup.

Earnings, however, introduces a completely different variable because the market is no longer simply evaluating the chart. It is evaluating expectations, and expectations are everything during earnings season.

Good Earnings Are Not Enough

One of the most important concepts traders need to understand during earnings season is that companies do not move based solely on whether the earnings report was good or bad. They move based on the difference between the results and what the market had already priced into the stock.

JPMorgan can beat earnings estimates and fall. It can miss certain estimates and rally. It can report record revenue and sell off because none of those outcomes would be unusual for a stock that has already experienced a tremendous run into the report. The higher the stock climbs heading into earnings, the more important expectations become because investors have already been anticipating strength.

The market will be watching net interest income, investment banking activity, trading revenue, credit quality, loan growth, expenses, capital returns, and management’s outlook for the economy. Those numbers matter, but I am not trying to predict every line of the earnings report because that is not our edge. Our edge comes from watching how the market reacts to the information and determining whether the reaction confirms or challenges the thesis that has been driving the stock higher.

The Earnings Reaction Matters More Than the Earnings Number

This is something I repeat every earnings season: trade the reaction, not the headline. Suppose JPMorgan reports strong earnings and gaps above the current base. The first question is not whether the numbers were good. The first question is whether the stock can hold the gap, attract strong volume, and establish itself above the all-time high. If it can, we could be looking at an earnings breakout and continuation setup, and the price action would tell us that the market had not fully priced in the strength of the business.

Now consider another scenario. JPMorgan reports strong earnings, gaps higher, and immediately sells off. That tells us something completely different because the good news may have already been priced into the stock. The market had anticipated strong results, buyers are no longer willing to pay higher prices, and traders who accumulated shares before earnings are using the report as an opportunity to take profits.

Then there is the scenario I often find most interesting. JPMorgan gaps lower after the report, the initial reaction looks bearish, and everyone assumes the trade is over. Instead of continuing lower, however, the stock finds buyers, reverses, and closes strong. That is the classic earnings gap-down reversal setup I watch every quarter because a stock that refuses to go down on supposedly bad news is telling us something important about demand.

The Levels I’m Watching

Heading into earnings, the first level is obvious: the all-time high. A decisive move through the recent highs with strong volume could trigger another momentum leg, especially if the rest of the financial sector confirms the move. I do not want to see JPMorgan barely poke above the highs and immediately fall back into the range. I want to see acceptance above the breakout level, strong volume, and evidence that institutions are willing to continue accumulating the stock at higher prices.

Below that, I am watching the short-term base and the rising 9 EMA around $333. If the stock pulls back after earnings but holds this area, the current momentum structure remains intact and the pullback could eventually create another continuation setup. Below that, the $320 region and the previous breakout zone become increasingly important because a sharp earnings pullback into prior resistance, followed by stabilization and a reversal, could create a much better risk-reward opportunity than chasing a large gap higher.

Finally, the rising 50-day moving average near $314 represents the more important intermediate-term trend level. A violation of the 50-day moving average would not automatically destroy the longer-term JPMorgan thesis, but it would represent a meaningful change in character that would force us to reevaluate the evidence. The deeper the pullback becomes, the more important it is to determine whether we are seeing normal profit-taking within an uptrend or the beginning of a larger shift in money flow.

JPMorgan Is Also a Market Tell

There is another reason I am watching this report closely. JPMorgan is not just another earnings trade. It is one of the most important financial institutions in the world, and its results can give us information about credit conditions, consumer health, corporate activity, capital markets, and the broader economy.

More importantly for traders, JPMorgan’s reaction could tell us something about the durability of the rotation into financials. If JPMorgan reports earnings and breaks out to new highs while other bank stocks participate, that would reinforce the idea that money continues to broaden beyond technology and into other areas of the market. If JPMorgan sells off but financials remain strong, that could tell us that the sector rotation remains intact even if the individual stock needs time to reset after a major run.

The scenario that would concern me most would be a JPMorgan breakdown accompanied by weakness spreading across the banks and financial sector. That would force us to consider whether one of the market’s strongest rotations is beginning to lose momentum. This is why I always say sector before ticker. The individual stock matters, but the money flow surrounding the stock gives us the context we need to determine whether weakness is an opportunity or a warning.

What I Want to See After Earnings

I do not need JPMorgan to gap 10% higher after earnings. In fact, I would probably prefer that it does not because a huge gap would make the stock increasingly difficult to enter without accepting poor risk-reward. The best situation might be a controlled reaction that allows JPMorgan to digest the report and establish another tradable setup.

A small gap higher followed by consolidation could create a breakout entry. A pullback into the rising 9 EMA or previous breakout area could create a continuation entry. A sharp gap lower followed by a strong reversal could create the earnings gap-down reversal setup that I watch every quarter. There are multiple ways this can develop, and the important point is that I do not need to predict which scenario will happen before the report.

The one thing I do not want to see is a major change in character. Heavy-volume selling, failure to recover, loss of important support levels, and weakness spreading across the financial sector would tell us that the evidence has changed. When the evidence changes, we change with it.

The Bigger Lesson From the JPMorgan Trade

JPMorgan has already been a valuable trade for us, but the bigger lesson has nothing to do with whether the stock goes higher after earnings. The lesson is about context and learning how to manage a position when the market does not cooperate perfectly with the levels we drew on the chart.

Rules are necessary. Stops are necessary. Risk management is necessary. Without them, there is no process. At the same time, the goal of trading is not to become a robot that blindly follows technical levels without understanding why we entered the trade in the first place. The goal is to develop a process for evaluating evidence and determining whether the original thesis remains intact.

Why did we enter the trade? Was money still rotating into financials? Was JPMorgan still acting like a leader? Were buyers continuing to step in on weakness? Was the longer-term structure still healthy? Had the character of the price action actually changed, or had we simply experienced normal volatility within a strong trend?

Those were the questions we continued asking during the JPMorgan trade. There were moments when individual stop levels were hit, but the larger evidence remained intact. Financials continued to strengthen, JPMorgan continued to attract buyers on weakness, and the larger trend continued higher. Instead of allowing one technical level to override everything else we were seeing, we continued working the idea as long as the evidence supported the thesis.

Now JPMorgan is sitting near all-time highs heading into one of the biggest catalysts of the quarter. I do not know exactly what the company will report, whether the stock will gap higher or lower, or how the market will initially react, and I do not need to know.

We saw the rotation early. We identified one of the leaders. We rode the pullbacks. We stayed with the trade even when the price action was not perfect because the larger evidence continued to support the thesis.

Now earnings gives us new information, and that is where the next part of the trade begins. We will watch the reaction, evaluate what happens across the financial sector, update our thesis, and trade what the market gives us.

Want more insights on trading? 

For more on swing trading check out my swing service at bullsonwallstreet.com and 7 Day Trial

Follow me on twitter and instagram.

Information on Personal Mentoring.

Author Bio

Paul J Singh is a 20+ year trader, Bullonwallstreet.com Swing Trading Coach, and swing trading mentor. He teaches traders how to combine technical analysis, options, risk management, and performance psychology into a repeatable edge.